O engenheiro de som

http://www.wimp.com/recordingengineer/

Eh,eh...é mesmo isso em certos casos....
O sucesso que a nossa Natalia Andrade faria hoje se tivesse um engenheiro destes...

É uma bela rábula

Accuracy is Not Applicable to Most Recordings Made Today

Most recordings made today are not intended to sound like the live performance.
Anyone who heard Taylor Swift's live performance with Stevie Nicks at the 2010
Grammy Awards understands why.(Note: you can relive the magical moment on
Youtube. Warning: this may be offensive for the musically-inclined). About 90%
of commercial recordings are studio creations consisting of a series of
overdubs, processed with auto-tuning, equalization, dynamic compression, and
reverb sampled from an alien nation. For these recordings, there is no
equivalent live performance to which the recording/reproduction can be compared
for accuracy. The only reference is what the artist heard over the loudspeakers
in the recording control room. If the important performance aspects of the
playback system through which the art (the music and recording) was created can
be reproduced in the home, then the consumer will hear an accurate reproduction
of the music, as the artist intended. It is possible to achieve this if we adopt
a science in the service of art philosophy towards audio recording and
reproduction.

Sean Olive - http://seanolive.blogspot.sg/2010/07/why-live-versus-recorded-listening.html

Nunca ouvi nada desta Taylor Swift mas aposto que o engenheiro de som faz maravilhas com as gravações de estúdio:


Ainda se queixam que os putos conseguem ouvir mp3...o que me espanta é que consigam escutar estes cantores de treta ao vivo!!!

R

ricardo onga-ku escreveu:

Não conhecia, mas olha que eu preferia ao vivo.

Ninguem bate o nosso Zé Cabra!!!!

É os acertos de tom com o melodyne


e os acertos de tempo que fazem uma diferença brutal e também dão uma trabalheira brutal na maior parte das vezes